Dear Jens, DBpedians,

> Input/opinions on those issues are welcome (if there is a best practice
> for this case, please let us know).

Treating http://live.dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing} as a normal
Web page (all Semantic Web / Linked Data foo aside) that has a
temporarily more up-to-date version of
http://dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing}; however, where everyone is
encouraged to use http://dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing} for the
long-term, the current best practice (from a search engine's point of
view) is to place a so-called canonical link [1] on
http://live.dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing} that points to
http://dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing}. This can hapen either via
a meta tag in the head section of the page, or (I guess in this case
the preferred solution) via a Link header in the HTTP header. What do
you think?

Best,
Tom

[1] http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394

-- 
Thomas Steiner, Research Scientist, Google Inc.
http://blog.tomayac.com, http://twitter.com/tomayac

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a 
definitive record of customers, application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c1
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion

Reply via email to