On 6/24/11 4:38 PM, Jens Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 24.06.2011 14:52, Thomas Steiner wrote: >> [Limiting CC list] >> >>> Quick question: on the basis of point 6, will resources in the main >>> http://dbpedia.org/ namespace soon reflect the latest changes from >>> DBpedia Live? >> ...also interested in this question. On a related note, will there be >> http://live.dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing} pages as an >> intermediate solution? > That's a valid and good question, which is, however, not that easy to > answer. For now, we went the simple route and do not serve DBpedia Live > data as Linked Data, although I see that it would be desirable to have it. > > If we serve it from http://live.dbpedia.org/{resource|page}/{Thing} that > implies changing the resource URIs accordingly (prefix > http://live.dbpedia.org/...). We could do that and add links to the > static URIs. A question would be whether it is desirable to have two > URIs for exactly the same thing from exactly the same source? > > If we would decide to have different URIs for the static and live > version, then a related question is whether it is better to use > http://dbpedia.org/resource/... and http://live.dbpedia.org/resource/ > - or - > http://dbpedia.org/resource/... and http://static.dbpedia.org/resource/ > The latter requires more changes on our (OpenLink, FUB, AKSW) side, but > might be more plausible in the mid/long term. > > Another option would be to use a single URI and a content negotiation > mechanism, which can deal with time > (http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2011/papers/ldow2011-paper02-coppens.pdf), > which would however introduce additional complexity. > > Input/opinions on those issues are welcome (if there is a best practice > for this case, please let us know). > > Kind regards, > > Jens > Jens,
Re. Linked Data do remember what's already in place (as part of the hot staging of this whole thing) at: http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/live . When that was constructed it included Linked Data deployment, naturally. Since Virtuoso is a common factor, its a VAD install to get a replica via live.dbpedia.org . Anyway, I know this is early days on the live.dbpedia.org side of things, and this is more about a SPARQL endpoint than entire Linked Data deliverable. Anyway, when it comes to Linked Data and all the other questions posed above, best to first look at what's already been done (over a year now) re: http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com :-) Examples (note: owl:sameAs relations): 1. http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/resource 2. http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/page/Slightly_Odway 3. http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http://dbpedia.org/resource/Slightly_Odway . Again install DBpedia vad and the issue of canonical URIs vanishes, the descriptor pages work (for humans or machines), and re. actual Linked Data is all good, -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c1 _______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
