Hi Anastasia,
On 28.06.2017 10:19, Anastasia Dimou wrote:
Dear Adam,
thank you for providing more alternatives for ontology editing!
I guess we do not necessarily need to go for a single solution but
there should be at least one! :) I mean there might be alternatives
and users might choose their preferred. We mainly thought of checking
the stability of the tools, how good they handle the DBpedia ontology
and how easy it is to maintain them long term.
yes, good point. In the end, ontologies need to be developed like
software or more specifically APIs as they provide an interface for the
data. So maybe we should focus on:
- git with validation on commit
- continuous integration
- validation (data quality and ontology quality)
Basically, be liberal about the tool, but check commits very carefully.
--
All the best,
Sebastian Hellmann
Director of Knowledge Integration and Linked Data Technologies (KILT)
Competence Center
at the Institute for Applied Informatics (InfAI) at Leipzig University
Executive Director of the DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://nlp2rdf.org,
http://linguistics.okfn.org, https://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt
<http://www.w3.org/community/ld4lt>
Homepage: http://aksw.org/SebastianHellmann
Research Group: http://aksw.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
DBpedia-discussion mailing list
DBpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
