On Feb 16, 2006, at 11:12, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Sally Floyd wrote:So this could be either a new CCID, or a negotiated variant of CCID3. In terms of implementation, I think it makes more sense to think of it as a negotiated variant of CCID3, but in terms of API interfaces, it is probably more straightforward to present it as a new CCID. Yes? No?Isn't it easier to negotiate if it is given its own CCID? Using yet another level of negotiation seems counter productive and may increase the delay.
I also think a new CCID may be most appropriate. (chair hat off) Lars -- Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
