Hi Sally, I'd like to hear your thinking on new CCID or negotiated option, but I'm with Lars on, at least naively, thinking that a new CCID would be a good idea (chair hat off too).
Tom P. > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 3:41 AM > To: Magnus Westerlund > Cc: Sally Floyd; Eddie Kohler; dccp group; Phelan, Tom; Allison Mankin > Subject: Re: [dccp] HEADS UP: WGLC on draft-ietf-dccp-tfrc-voip-04.txt, > ends 2006-2-18 > > On Feb 16, 2006, at 11:12, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > > Sally Floyd wrote: > >> So this could be either a new CCID, or a negotiated variant of CCID3. > >> In terms of implementation, I think it makes more sense to think of > >> it as a negotiated variant of CCID3, but in terms of API interfaces, > >> it is probably more straightforward to present it as a new CCID. > >> Yes? No? > > > > Isn't it easier to negotiate if it is given its own CCID? Using yet > > another level of negotiation seems counter productive and may > > increase the delay. > > I also think a new CCID may be most appropriate. > > (chair hat off) > > Lars > -- > Lars Eggert NEC Network Laboratories >
