On 11 May 2007, at 15:36, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
Some WG last call comments:
A. Section 4.4:
In the case an RTP session bridges multiple DCCP connections it
might be worth noting that support of TMMBR from draft-ietf-avt-ccm
could help. I would suggest including an informative reference to it.
Okay.
B. Section 5.2:
There need to be a statement with normative reference on which
formal language the SDP attribute definition is made in.
You mean a normative statement that the grammar in section 5.2 is
specified using ABNF as defined in RFC 4234?
Colin
