On 5/16/07, Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following up on this, since no NAT that I know of currently
translates DCCP, IMO there isn't a need to be as super-conservative
with the timeout as ICE needs to be for UDP. Something longer is
probably fine.
Lars
Linux has translated DCCP for NAT for quite a few releases now. Don't
know what the timeout is though. It is treated basically the same as
TCP and UDP.
Ian
--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
WAND Network Research Group
