Phelan, Tom wrote:
Hi Gorry,
See inline. Stuff I have no comment on has been snipped.
Tom P.
<snip>
Section 3.3.2:
Is the requirement here a repetition of an earlier req at a lower
strength -- one port MAY be associated with multiple SCs as opposed to
SHOULD in a previous req?
GF> Not sure which previous requirement?
[Tom P.] Not sure where it was, but previously you had said that an
implementation SHOULD allow a port to be associated with multiple SCs.
Ah, OK.
This is the other way round, a single SC can be used with multiple ports
(i.e. registered with at most one, but used with several dynamic ports
if needed). I've tidied the text:
"A specific Service Code value MAY be associated with one server port
registered with IANA, and/or MAY be associated with one or more server
ports in the dynamic range."
Thanks,
Gorry
