Thanks Colin,
Both of these comments will be used to update the version that I post.
Gorry
Colin Perkins wrote:
Hi gorry,
On 20 Mar 2008, at 13:45, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
I've updated the SC draft in-line with the various inputs. Since there
were many comments - and some of these conflicted, I have made an
interim version at:
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gorry/dccp/SC/
Please do look and see if this version corrects the issues, and tell
me of any remaining or new issues.
A couple of minor issues:
- Section 1.1, top of page 6, grammar: "No protocols issues arise from a
port being associated with two Service Codes, each bound to different
applications does not raise any protocol issues."
- Section 3.3.1, second bullet point: rather than MUST reject the
connection with reason "Bad Service Code", it may be appropriate to
suggest that servers SHOULD reject the connection with reason "Bad
Service Code", but MAY use the reason "Connection Refused". Requiring a
Bad Service Code response allows an information leak - something is
listening on the port - which some servers may wish to avoid.
Cheers,
The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.
