Hi, On 2009-12-24, at 2:29, Pasi Sarolahti wrote: > After further discussing with people during the past couple of weeks, > and in the interest of making progress on this topic, we are planning > to proceed with adopting draft-phelan-dccp-natencap as a DCCP working > group draft.
could I suggest that Tom resubmit an update of draft-phelan-dccp-natencap as a WG draft, and post a list of open issues? (That way, we can decide if the WG should meet at IETF-77 or not.) Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
