On 27/10/05, Yoshifumi Nishida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to do interoperability tests between netbsd and linux 
> implementation.

Great!!

> I found that two issues so far. One issue is that linux implementation doesn't
> have feature negotiation function yet, but netbsd implementation presumes it
> and wait for a confirm packet forever. I will work on this issue later.

Yes we are well aware of this.
>
> Second issue is that CCID3 receiver on linux sends ACKs with time stamp option
> and does not send ACKs with elapsed time option. (As far as I tested..)
> It seems to me that CCID3 receiver must use elapsed time option or can use 
> time
> stamp echo option in case that CCID3 sender uses time stamp option.
> (According to section 8.2.in draft-ietf-dccp-ccid3-11.txt)

I'm aware that our time options aren't perfect as well and will
investigate or leave to somebody else to investigate. There were a
couple of problems with time options - this being one and the other
that the timestamps were actually incorrect. I believe we have fixed
the latter but I would be interested to see if you agree on that.
>
> If I misunderstand anything, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshifumi Nishida
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc.

--
Ian McDonald
http://wand.net.nz/~iam4
WAND Network Research Group
University of Waikato
New Zealand
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to