On 11/28/06, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In short: my suggestion is to keep an experimental patch for this and I
would even offer to
> > keep one up-to-date and online, if in return we can simplify the
socket API. Does
> > this sound like a more convincing argument?
>
> Fair enough, I think we should go this way for now, please post here
> the patch that provides the experimental feature of explicitely
> setting the packet size, interested people can try and use it and
> report their findings, later we can get back and possibly merge the
> patch if it proves useful.
>
Basically my patches from a month or two ago would do this with a few
changes. I'd say merge average patch, I'll update mine to go on top
(tomorrow??) and allow a mechanism to switch to use it.
OK, additionally I'm replacing:
+ DCCP_WARN("sockopt(PACKET_SIZE) is deprecated: fix your app\n");
+ err = -EINVAL;
By
+ DCCP_WARN("sockopt(PACKET_SIZE) not yet supported\n");
+ err = -EINVAL;
To better reflect what we've discussed so far.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
