On 11/28/06, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/28/06, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In short: my suggestion is to keep an experimental patch for this and I would even offer to > > > keep one up-to-date and online, if in return we can simplify the socket API. Does > > > this sound like a more convincing argument? > > > > Fair enough, I think we should go this way for now, please post here > > the patch that provides the experimental feature of explicitely > > setting the packet size, interested people can try and use it and > > report their findings, later we can get back and possibly merge the > > patch if it proves useful. > > > Basically my patches from a month or two ago would do this with a few > changes. I'd say merge average patch, I'll update mine to go on top > (tomorrow??) and allow a mechanism to switch to use it.OK, additionally I'm replacing: + DCCP_WARN("sockopt(PACKET_SIZE) is deprecated: fix your app\n"); + err = -EINVAL; By + DCCP_WARN("sockopt(PACKET_SIZE) not yet supported\n"); + err = -EINVAL; To better reflect what we've discussed so far.
Ah, also s/-EINVAL/-EOPNOTSUPP/g - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
