On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:18:30 +0000, Gerrit Renker wrote:
> Maybe the code would be clearer to read this way:
> 
>       hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi = scaled_div32(((u64)hctx->ccid4hctx_s) << 6,
>                                            hctx->ccid4hctx_x));
>       if (hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi <  MIN_SEND_RATE)
>               hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi = MIN_SEND_RATE;

Yes, it would. I was going to ask whether one of them would be
considered more effective, but I then realised this is probably one of
those cases where you should write readable code and let the compiler to
worry about the rest.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to