2007/11/9, Tommi Saviranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:18:30 +0000, Gerrit Renker wrote: > > Maybe the code would be clearer to read this way: > > > > hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi = scaled_div32(((u64)hctx->ccid4hctx_s) << 6, > > hctx->ccid4hctx_x)); > > if (hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi < MIN_SEND_RATE) > > hctx->ccid4hctx_t_ipi = MIN_SEND_RATE; > > Yes, it would. I was going to ask whether one of them would be > considered more effective, but I then realised this is probably one of > those cases where you should write readable code and let the compiler to > worry about the rest. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
Yes, I also agree with this. Leandro. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
