On 4/20/06, Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes I understand. Attached is the patch to the questionable missing > break which is when missining intentional strange and should at least be > documented.
Thanks, is fixed in SVN > One more question I don't see any code that deals with the situations > where one changes e.g. the name of column/table, removes a column/table, > ... which is referenced in indices, foreign keys, ... . I'm not exactly sure what you mean ? Tom
