Thanks, after this explanation, it sounds extremely silly on my side :) Best, Deepak
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Wolfgang Bangerth <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/27/2016 10:05 AM, Deepak Gupta wrote: > >> >> >> If I remove the else part of the if-condition, it works, else the >> constraints >> become zero. This implies, I should not try to set boundary indicator for >> anything which is not at the boundary, >> > > Correct. > > which is obvious. I know it was a >> mistake from my side, but I would like to know why it was a problem (what >> goes >> on in the background as per the implementation?) >> > > In essence you are saying that some interior face is a boundary. If you > come from each of the two adjacent cells, the interface will then look like > an external boundary (at which there can be no neighbor) and so no > constraints will be computed. > > > Best > W. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- > The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ > For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/fo > rum/dealii?hl=en > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "deal.II User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
