As far as I understand all implicit time-stepping methods in the TimeStepping-namespace take a function which invert the jacobian matrix and the mass matrix (combined). This is done using a sparse solver (UMFPACK). Is it that still possible for a larger system (10kk DoFs), or do I have to resort to other methods, after inverting the sparse matrix will result in a dense matrix (which likely will overflow my memory)?
-- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/ccfe4a75-775d-471b-b69e-4a886c2e443d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
