Hi, bin gerade ueber einen lesenswerten Artikel gestolpert:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/raw-flaw.shtml der interessante Punkt imho: > Now we all know that there are quite a few companies that > write generic RAW converters. Many of these are small cottage > industries and are highly unlikely to be prosecuted by the likes > of the large camera makers. But there are larger companies, such > as Adobe and Phase One, which are much more tempting targets for > lawsuits, and who have litigation and liability lawyers who try > and look after their best interests. > > This is what has happened in early 2005. Both Adobe with Camera > RAW 3.1 and Phase One with Capture One 3.7 have refused to decode > Nikon's new white balance encryption on D2x and D50 camera files. > Not that they couldn't (individual programmers did it days after > it was released), but because it exposes these corporations to > liability. Die Argumente erinnern an den sicherlich bekannten Artikel von John Gilmore: http://www.toad.com/gnu/whatswrong.html http://www.openraw.org/ versucht das begehren entsprechend zu buendeln. \Thomas\bye -- Wer sich zuviel mit kleinen Dingen abgibt, wird gewoehnlich unfaehig zu grossen. Rochefoucauld -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
