On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:33:44AM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Martín Ferrari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sadly, I wasn't in the meeting to discuss this. I don't understand > > what's about this keynote-frenzy. It's just to make a point to MarkS? > > It's mainly because if we are going to have keynotes, we should have > more than one. I started it, when I realized that Mark's talk was > being listed as the only keynote of the conference. > > > That seems silly to me, specially when I have already stated many > > times that we (the papers committee) accepted MarkS talk but as a > > *regular talk*. > > Where was this officially communicated? The only entry I found about > this is a comment in the talk review. **The talk is still a keynote > in the public listing of talks**. >
Folks, talk this in private and fix the chain of misunderstanding we have here. Mark's proposal was accepted as keynote. For the record, category keynote was not in pentabarf and i have not idea why ganneff decided add it... second, nobody changed that from keynote to talk because nobody has permissions. So at least I was waiting ganneff change it. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
