On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 11:40:12PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Thanks for writing that up. i'm fine with the current text on that page: [...] > I'd be fine with moving forward with this plan if there are no objections.
I don't have any strong opinion on whether or not we move forward this way, so look to other responses or non-responses for feedback on that. If we do move forward this way, that sounds like a good text. For ease of automation, I'll mention that the lowest 20 out of the 102 non-plenary/non-canceled-attendance/non-Unscheduled events were exactly those with a penta ranking score of 33 or lower, which from memory is stored in the event_rating table. Thanks for following this through to completion! - Jimmy Kaplowitz [email protected] _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
