On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Pablo Duboue <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 06/03/2010 04:00 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:27:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>> On 06/03/2010 02:59 PM, micah anderson wrote:
> >>>> 2. send a reject notice to the bottom 20 that did not make the cut due
> >>>> to the ratings
> >>>
> >>> could you draft the rejection notice you're proposing someplace?
> >>
> >> Sure, but I welcome others to make changes. See the bottom of
> >> http://whiteboard.debian.net/dc10-talks-mails.wb
> >
> > Thanks for writing that up.  i'm fine with the current text on that page:
> >
> > ----------------------------
> > == Talk rejected ==
> >
> > Hello $PERSON--
> >
> > Thanks for submitting your proposal event $TITLE for DebConf10.
> >
> > We appreciate your interest and the time you invested in putting
> > together your proposed event. As you may know, we had a large
> > number of submissions for talks, and a limited number of
> > resources. After a long selection process your event was not
> > selected for this year's Debconf.
> >
> > Thank you very much for taking the time to submit your event, we
> > enjoyed having it as an option.
> >
> > We hope this doesn't discourage you from attending Debconf, in
> > fact there will be opportunities for ad-hoc events to occur, if
> > you should wish to still put it on. Details on how that will work
> > will be available at the conference.
> >
> > sincerely,
> > the debconf talks team
> > ------------------------
>
> What about:
>
>
> Hello $PERSON--
>
> Thanks for submitting your proposal event $TITLE for DebConf10.
>
> We appreciate your interest and the time you invested in putting
> together your proposed event. Our talk selection committee felt
> your submission on its current form would not attract enough
> interest among the DebConf attendees and it will not merit
> your effort put forward in preparing the talk.
>

Proposing (Knowing that it might open the question "What are the
criterion?".:
 s/would not attract enough interest amount the DebConf attendees and it
will not merit your effort put forward in preparing the talk/does not
exactly meet the criterion for a DebConf presentation./

Thank you very much for taking the time to submit your event.
>
> We hope this doesn't discourage you from attending Debconf, in
> fact there will be opportunities for ad-hoc events to occur, if
> you should wish to still put it on (if you decide to do so, we can
> provide extended feedback to ensure a better fit for DebConf).
> Details on how that will work will be available at the conference.
>
> sincerely,
> the debconf talks team
> _______________________________________________
> Debconf-team mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
>
_______________________________________________
Debconf-team mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team

Reply via email to