On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 04:06:05PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 12:46:17AM -0400, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Technically that was restricted to a venue decision for 2007 and was > > revoked later anyway [0] as part of making the decision using public > > criteria and an open IRC discussion (which aiui has only improved > > since). > > Thanks for following up with this information! Given that the > delegation was revoked, I'm now closing this bug report. > > > Personally, I'd suggest just getting Stefano to do a new > > delegation of some active/key debconf people and ignore the old stuff. > > Agreed, and the debconf-team people who attended the "debian vs debconf" > BoF should already know that I'm positive about that. I guess the issue > now is identifying the candidates for the delegation; it should probably > be postponed to the "debian vs debconf" discussion which is planned for > September.
I've just gotten home and am probably going afk for some relaxation soon. But, I wanted to point out that only a few members of the DC10 localteam were active in the debian vs debconf discussion (event 658). I hope that more of them can and will contribute to the September discussion. -edrz _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
