Richard Darst dijo [Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:22:32AM -0400]: > > The budgets we had at Le Camp were/are IMO plausibe, have they still not > > been > > added to svn? > > I don't think that's agreed. Any budget which remotely looks close > has ZERO travel sponsorship. (and the best budget anyone has produced > still have deficits, despite assuming 50% more sponsorship than last > year)
Travel sponsorship is very important. However, it *is* something we could do without. If some weeks/months ago we were worried because too many people would arrive, having no travel sponsorship would "help" somewhat. I'm torn at writing this, because that "help" would translate into having less people able to attend — But it is a real thougt anyway. Now... *I* draw a line: I'm willing to accept a DebConf with no travel sponsorship, but not one where it is hard to get sponsored accomodation and food. _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
