This whole subthread about color names illustrates why people like me don't provide suggestions any more (which turns into a feedback loop). Moray has an excellent point, making things more obscure is going to lead to problems later. It would be best to make registration as obvious as possible, without needing to dig through layers of things to understand. Simplicity has been my overriding goal this year. Of course, right now it seems that technical beauty is better and thus discussing it won't help anything.
I realize that sending this message may have a demotivating effect, but right now it looks like it is naysaying moray vs a highly organized local team. It's just that the rest of us are no longer invested since (in my case at least) the cost to benefit ratio is not worth it. I just wanted to clarify that other people support moray's viewpoints (not just here, but in general), and point out that DebConf general consensus is being lost as most of us have given up arguing. And now, it's too late to adjust team dynamics, so I leave it in the localteam's able hands to figure it out and make it work. - Richard -- | Richard Darst - rkd@ - pyke: up 1 day, 18:03 | http://rkd.zgib.net - pgp 0xBD356740 | "Ye shall know the truth and -- the truth shall make you free" _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
