martin f krafft <[email protected]> writes: > also sprach Steve Langasek <[email protected]> [2014-02-25 23:14 +0100]: >> I think in NYC they didn't care because there was zero risk of >> anyone driving home from the party ;P (And that's not much >> different in this case, either!) > > It was also 2010. They've had almost 4 years since then to improve > the laws and better protect the people from themselves. ;)
Ha! Well at least Oregon repealed an OLCC law within the last decade that "no liquor shall be bought or sold on the sabbath". Also one benefit of having the old OLCC prohibiton era relic in the information age, there's a centralized database of liquor availability: http://oregonliquorsearch.com/ Okay, off-topic, sorry... -- Gerald Turner <[email protected]> Encrypted mail preferred! OpenPGP: 4096R / CA89 B27A 30FA 66C5 1B80 3858 EC94 2276 FDB8 716D
pgph9ZtnOmlEa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
