On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> videos.d.n is quite very confusing as there is already video.d.n Seconded. This is what mailman held due to a missing subscription (with the correct sending address): Does it really make sense to have 'video' and 'videos' at once? It seems as if this would lead to confusion down the road. Will the service at videoS.d.n live for a long time? If not, another namespace may be better. In this specific case, video.debconf14.debconf.org might be the best option. Event-specific and without risk of confusion. It _is_ kinda long, though. Richard _______________________________________________ Debconf-video mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
