On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Richard Hartmann < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Holger Levsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > videos.d.n is quite very confusing as there is already video.d.n > > Seconded. This is what mailman held due to a missing subscription > (with the correct sending address): > > Does it really make sense to have 'video' and 'videos' at once? It > seems as if this would lead to confusion down the road. > Probably not, but I didn't want to try and take over an existing name. If anyone thinks video.debian.net can be used, that wold be great. > > Will the service at videoS.d.n live for a long time? If not, another > namespace may be better. > I expect it will live for years. > > In this specific case, video.debconf14.debconf.org might be the best > option. Event-specific and without risk of confusion. It _is_ kinda > long, though. > > The host name shouldn't be event-specific. event is one of the fields in the db, so you can pull up all the talks by the same person/topic/tag over the years: example: http://pyvideo.org/speaker/307/ben-rousch I plan to pull in all the previous dc videos, but that can wait till later. Getting the speaker names may be hard, so that likely won't happen. > > Richard > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-video mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video > -- Carl K
_______________________________________________ Debconf-video mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-video
