debian-68k  

Messages by Date

• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/16 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/15 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/14 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/14 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Klos
• 2025/06/14 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/14 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/14 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/13 Re: Debian boot/login time Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k David Brownlee
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Laurent Vivier
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Klos
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k ALeX Kazik
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/13 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Christian Groessler
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jason Thorpe
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/12 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/11 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Stefan Reinauer
• 2025/06/11 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/11 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/11 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Eero Tamminen
• 2025/06/11 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Stan Johnson
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/10 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/08 Re: Bug#1107416: gcc-14: Please build with -fno-fold-mem-offsets on m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/08 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Martin Husemann
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jason Thorpe
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jason Thorpe
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Klos
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Anders Magnusson
• 2025/06/07 Bug#1107416: gcc-14: Please build with -fno-fold-mem-offsets on m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Anders Magnusson
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/07 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/06 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Finn Thain
• 2025/06/06 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Martin Husemann
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Anders Magnusson
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jean-Michel Hautbois
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/05 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jean-Michel Hautbois
• 2025/06/04 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/02 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/02 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/02 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/02 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/02 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/02 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux Andreas Schwab
• 2025/06/01 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/06/01 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux Jeff Law
• 2025/06/01 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/28 Re: DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux Andreas Schwab
• 2025/05/28 DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN on NetBSD vs Linux John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/26 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jason Thorpe
• 2025/05/26 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/26 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jeffrey Walton
• 2025/05/26 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/26 Re: Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k Jeffrey Walton
• 2025/05/26 Question on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT in GCC on NetBSD/m68k John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/25 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/21 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/21 Re: Debian subset suitable for m68k (was: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int) Eero Tamminen
• 2025/05/21 Re: Debian subset suitable for m68k (was: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/21 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Klos
• 2025/05/21 Re: Debian subset suitable for m68k (was: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int) Eero Tamminen
• 2025/05/21 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/21 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int James Le Cuirot
• 2025/05/21 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/21 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Klos
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/20 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Finn Thain
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int James Le Cuirot
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Florian Weimer
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Andreas Schwab
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/19 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/18 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/18 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Antonio Vargas Gonzalez
• 2025/05/18 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int Antonio Vargas Gonzalez
• 2025/05/18 Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/14 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/14 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/14 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Laurent Vivier
• 2025/05/14 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Laurent Vivier
• 2025/05/14 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/13 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/13 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/13 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/13 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/13 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/05/12 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Finn Thain
• 2025/05/12 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Klos
• 2025/05/12 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/12 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Finn Thain
• 2025/05/12 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/05/12 Re: Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Finn Thain
• 2025/05/11 Bug#1105110: python3.14 FTBFS on m68k: Assertion `!PyStackRef_IsTaggedInt(ref)' failed Stefano Rivera
• 2025/04/23 Re: Bug#1103627: openjdk-20: Remove from Debian? Matthias Klose (Ubuntu)
• 2025/04/06 boost1.88 also ftbfs on alpha, hppa, m68k, sh4. Matthias Klose
• 2025/04/06 Bug#1102196: boost1.88 unknown architectures Matthias Klose
• 2025/04/05 [RFH] Creating an FTBFS package list due to 2-byte alignment John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/03/17 Re: Packages no longer built on 32 bit: libisal, python-isal, fastp John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/03/17 Packages no longer built on 32 bit: libisal, python-isal, fastp Mattias Ellert
• 2025/03/09 Re: Alignment discussion wiki page John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/03/09 Alignment discussion wiki page John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/03/09 Re: Alignment discussion wiki page Geert Uytterhoeven
• 2025/03/08 Bug#1099833: wiki.debian.org: Verbatim text containing "8k/com" triggers spam filter John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2025/02/19 Bug#1098331: RM: genwqe-user [armel armhf i386 mipsel] -- ROM; Build issues on 32 bit architectures Andreas Tille
• 2024/12/03 Bug#1088935: libseccomp: Please package git snapshot for experimental John Paul Adrian Glaubitz

• Earlier messages
• Later messages