GRRRMBL it seems mutt completely garbled my mail, redoing it. Hynek Hanke, le Fri 24 Sep 2010 14:50:20 +0200, a écrit : > I would very much prefer to try to include 0.7.1 in Squeeze.
I can check with debian-release, but that'll be hard. > I'm not sure what is the status of the pthread issue > reported in this mail? > http://lists.freebsoft.org/pipermail/speechd/2010q3/003046.html > Is this a bug in the package? Is it a bug in the build process? > Is it a but at all? It is a bug in the build process. € nm -D libspeechd.so.2.2.1 | grep pthread U pthread_cancel U pthread_cond_destroy U pthread_cond_init U pthread_cond_signal U pthread_cond_wait U pthread_create U pthread_exit U pthread_join U pthread_mutex_destroy U pthread_mutex_init U pthread_mutex_lock U pthread_mutex_unlock libspeechd.so uses pthread_create, so it needs to explicitly link against the library that provides it, i.e. -lpthread. libc provides a couple of stubs for things like mutex_lock & such, but clearly not for pthread_create :) It works by chance for applications which happen to use pthreads already (and thus get the pthread_create symbol), but not for applications which do not use pthreads at all. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
