Christopher C. Chimelis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 06:34:45PM -0600, Michael Stroucken wrote: > > > > Does that mean that ccc will compile it correctly? What about a > > lower version of gcc? > > It might, but I haven't tested ccc on that yet. Most likely, egcs 1.1.2 > may do a decent job at it, but it will probably still have problems here > and there. I'm probably going to test a new gcc snapshot this week to > see if that helps.
Don't mozilla builds on Linux specifically require gcc? I'm pretty sure I read that someplace, something to do with asm used. On a related note; I don't see why we can't package a beta gcc just for Alpha? After all it seems we are the only ones with major gcc problems?!? Ron
