On Thu 01 Mar 2001, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > > Ok, great. I think the problem is directly caused by the C++ breaking in > > gcc. I'm going to have another go at at least fixing it well enough to > > handle small stuff like this (handling Qt is another story altogether). > > Ok, found the problem...I'll be uploading a gcc NMU for tomorrow's > dinstall. I don't think it'll fix big stuff like QT (testing it now), but > it should work ok for this little stuff.
I saw that there was 1:2.95.3-6 in the archive for the other arches, did you miss that or is there a reason you're sticking to -5 for the NMU? Paul
