On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 02:02:18AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > Hi, > > swisswatch 0.6-7.1 was badly numbered on alpha: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ madison swisswatch > swisswatch | 0.6-7 | stable | source, arm, i386, m68k, powerpc, > sparc > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | stable | alpha > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, > ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, > hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc > > That is, 0.6-7.1 was just a recompile of 0.6-7 on alpha, but was > numbered like a source NMU, so the real source NMU that followed it has > never been built on alpha. Could someone please upload a binary NMU of > swisswatch numbered as 0.6-7.1.1? > > I noticed this because alpha's swisswatch still uses /usr/doc, whereas > all the others use /usr/share/doc. > > Thanks, >
Just done. -- Francesco P. Lovergine
