On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:03:43PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 02:02:18AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > swisswatch 0.6-7.1 was badly numbered on alpha: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ madison swisswatch > > swisswatch | 0.6-7 | stable | source, arm, i386, m68k, > > powerpc, sparc > > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | stable | alpha > > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, > > ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc > > swisswatch | 0.6-7.1 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, > > hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sh, sparc > > > > That is, 0.6-7.1 was just a recompile of 0.6-7 on alpha, but was > > numbered like a source NMU, so the real source NMU that followed it has > > never been built on alpha. Could someone please upload a binary NMU of > > swisswatch numbered as 0.6-7.1.1? > > Just done.
Normally speaking, binary NMUs don't include source in the upload; now all the other architectures are having to rebuild. Oh well, I suppose it does the job, indirectly ... Thanks, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
