On 03/05/11 07:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/30/2011 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
Secondly, I noted a number of test suite failures in the ld component
while building binutils.
"Large number"? I get
[...snip...]
=== ld tests ===
Running target alpha-qemu
FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol
XPASS: Preserve default . = 0
XPASS: Preserve explicit . = 0
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 278
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 7
Building binutils 2.21.51.20110419-2 from Debian (also with my fix tls
patch) I get:
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Build libpr9676-4a.so
FAIL: Build libpr9679.so
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers24b
FAIL: vers24c
FAIL: vers30
FAIL: vers31
FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol
XPASS: Preserve default . = 0
XPASS: Preserve explicit . = 0
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 505
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 34
# of untested testcases 1
I see there's a lot more tests done with the unix target, nevertheless
I'll re-test with binutils master cvs to see if some of those unexpected
failures go away.
Cheers
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
