On 03/05/11 21:21, Michael Cree wrote:
On 03/05/11 07:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/30/2011 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
Secondly, I noted a number of test suite failures in the ld component
while building binutils.
Building binutils 2.21.51.20110419-2 from Debian (also with my fix tls
patch) I get:
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Build libpr9676-4a.so
It passes on amd64 and powerpc. Amd64 has in the readelf output of
libpr9676-4a.so the following line:
52: 0000000000000650 6 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 12 foo
(and similarly powerpc) which is tested for by (and matches) the
following regular expression:
+[0-9]+: +[0-9a-f]+ +[0-9a-f]+ +FUNC +LOCAL +DEFAULT +[0-9]+ +_?foo
that is in pr9676.rd.
But the output of readelf of libpr9676-4a.so on Alpha contains the
following:
45: 00000000000007c0 8 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT [<other>: 80]
11 foo
That is, it contains an extra "[<other>: 80]" which does not match the
regular expression in the test.
So my question is, what is this "[<other>: 80]"? Does it matter? Is
this failure a false report?
Cheers
Michael.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
