On 26/11/11 01:20, Bob Tracy wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:23:01PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: >> ... >> >> 2) Set optimization to use -O1 not -O2. >> >> 3) Now this one is *very* *interesting*. I added -Wl,--no-relax to >> LDFLAGS in debian/rules, but I think I got it wrong, because --no-relax >> did not appear anywhere in the logs, i.e., it did not get added to any >> of the linking stages, and what's more, the build completed without >> GPREL16 relocation errors!!!!!!! Make of that what you will. >> It is installed and working on a PWS600au under the xfce4 desktop >> environment, with KMS on a HD2400 Radeon card. > > :-). There was a recent binutils upgrade. I wonder...
No, binutils is not fixed. The GPREL16 relocation error still occurs with other packages. I suspect the use of -O1 may cause the compiler to pass --no-relax to the linker. > Which compiler version did you use for your build? Latest gcc-4.4, i.e., the default. > Ok... Rub it in :-). How long did the iceweasel build take on your > shiny new toy? Just under 4 hours as a single process build. > Might have to have you crank out an official "-O0" or > "-O1" build of QT4 so I can release the hold on 25 binary packages. OK, I'll take a look at that one. I presume you mean qt4-x11? Cheers Michael. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
