On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 07:02:15PM -0600, Bob Tracy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:00:59PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote: > > Did you build with latest toolchain? I suspect the issue has > > appeared with toolchain changes (hard to pin down when because there > > was quite a period in which a new version of guile-2.0 was not > > uploaded). > > I think I answered the toolchain question in my reply to Adrian's > earlier message. There was an attached "packages" file with the complete > list of what I've got installed on the PWS.
I don't seem to have received that message. Taking it that you did use up to date toolchain then that is rather interesting that guile-2.0 built for you. I ran a test rebuild a week or two ago and it failed. Maybe I should try again, but if it fails for me again that would raise issues of: - UP versus SMP since I test built on an SMP system. - sbuild environment. I will set a test rebuild going again soon and report back. > are only loosely specified (e.g., >= some value), are the dependencies > considered "best" satisfied with a stable package version meeting the > requirement? Or is the current unstable version of a dependency > preferred when building for "sid"? Many variables to consider, I guess. Yes, built against up to date sid. Cheers Michael.
