Hello Steve, thank you for your detailed answer.
On 05-May-06 00:24, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:58:27AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > > sarge/main/amd64 BTS Bug Problem description > > ---------------- ------- > > --------------------------------------------------- > > debian-installer #306976+ libdevmapper1.00 does not exist (should be 1.01) > > debian-installer #307306+ Uses kernel 2.6.10 which is not in sarge > > syslinux #306123+ amd64 missing from architecture list and FTBFS > > I don't believe debian-installer is going to have any more sourceful uploads > before sarge releases. I am not sure, but #306976 might occur on i386 too. I have not enough experience with debian-installer to say anything definite about the real importance of that bug. I just know for certain that it prevents building debian-installer on amd64 unless a patch is applied which 's/libdevmapper1.00/libdevmapper1.01/' in build/pkg-lists/monolithic/common. I did not check it, but it looks like the same may happen on i386. > A few things you might want to do with this list here: > > - gloss the '*' and '+' symbols after the bug numbers > - re-check against the BTS and/or do rebuild testing, to make sure it's > current (cal3d, for instance, is bug #305411, fixed in unstable and > testing) > - split out the ones you think people could usefully work on doing NMUs for > (so like, not radiusd-livingston, which has been obsolete for the better > part of a decade, and ugh, why are we still shipping that?; and not xview, > which isn't likely to ever get fixed) > - post it to debian-devel so people can poke through these for the BSP this > weekend I will try to fix the list according to your suggestions and post it to debian-devel, thanks. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
