wow, what a surprise ! I've built the packages using your patch, and openoffice compile and _works_ just fine (I initially just wanted to see what was broken ;)
I am currently uploading the packages I've built to a faster server (ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/) so other people can test and confirm I am not going crazy or doing some mistake :) you will need to install gcj-4.1 from experimental to be able to get these packages (or maybe it was gcc-4.1, I have both ...) thanks Emmanuel for the tip ;) btw, I did not got your error Emmanuel, it just built fine, maybe you had an incomplete build laying around before ? Cheers, Mik Emmanuel Fleury a écrit : > Hi all, > > I have some problem to build the debian package of OpenOffice 2.0.1. > > Here is what I do: > > 1) Add the experimental repository in my /etc/apt/sources.list: > > # Debian Experimental repository (sources) > deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian experimental main > > 2) Get the sources: > apt-get source -t experimental openoffice.org > > 3) Get the build dependancies: > su -c 'apt-get build-dep openoffice.org' > > 4) Move to the directory: > cd openoffice-2.0.1/ > > 5) Apply the patch attached to this mail: > patch -p1 < ../compile_openoffice_x86_64.diff > > 6) Build the sources: > dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -us -uc > > 7) Wait............ :) > > At the end, I got all the sources compiled but I get the following errors: > > # generate maintainer scripts from *.in > # or generate default script which calls hook in > openoffice.org-debian-files package > for PKG in `dh_listpackages`; do \ > for FILE in postinst postrm preinst prerm; do \ > MAINTSCRIPT=debian/$PKG.$FILE ; \ > if [ -e $MAINTSCRIPT.in ]; then \ > sed -n '1,/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/p' < $MAINTSCRIPT.in | > sed -e '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/d' > $MAINTSCRIPT; \ > grep LIBSUFFIX debian/scripts/vars.amd64 >> $MAINTSCRIPT; \ > cat debian/shell-lib.sh >> $MAINTSCRIPT; \ > sed -n '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/,$p' < $MAINTSCRIPT.in | > sed -e '/^#INCLUDE_SHELL_LIB#$/d' >> $MAINTSCRIPT; \ > else \ > echo '#!/bin/sh' > $MAINTSCRIPT ; \ > echo THIS_PACKAGE=$PKG >> $MAINTSCRIPT ;\ > echo THIS_SCRIPT=$FILE >> $MAINTSCRIPT ;\ > cat debian/shell-lib.sh >> $MAINTSCRIPT; \ > fi; \ > done; \ > done > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > grep: debian/scripts/vars.amd64: No such file or directory > touch debian/stampdir/maintscripts > /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules DH_OPTIONS="-Npython-uno > -Nopenoffice.org-gcj -Nopenoffice.org-hunspell > -Nopenoffice.org-filter-so52 -s" binary-common > make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2' > dh_testdir > dh_testdir: I have no package to build > make[1]: *** [binary-common] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/home/fleury/devel/projects/openoffice/openoffice.org-2.0.1-2' > make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 2 > > > I think I did set BUILD_AMD64 to 'y' in debian/rules, but I'm not sure. :-/ > > Can somebody help me to complete this patch ? > > Regards > -- > Emmanuel Fleury > > First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, > then they fight you, then you win. > -- Mahatma Gandhi > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > diff -ruN openoffice.org-2.0.1/debian/rules > openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/debian/rules > --- openoffice.org-2.0.1/debian/rules 2006-01-01 15:27:14.000000000 +0100 > +++ openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/debian/rules 2006-01-10 08:18:48.000000000 > +0100 > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > endif > > ifeq "$(ARCH)" "amd64" > + BUILD_AMD64=y > BUILD_PYUNO=n > else > BUILD_PYUNO=y > diff -ruN openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply > openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply > --- openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply 2006-01-01 > 15:27:13.000000000 +0100 > +++ openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/apply 2006-01-03 > 21:46:10.000000000 +0100 > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ > DebianBase : LinuxCommon, SystemDB, DebianBaseOnly > Debian : DebianBase, DebianOnly, DebianSidOnly > DebianSarge : DebianBase, DebianOnly, DebianSargeOnly > -Debian64 : DebianBase, 64bit, DebianOnly > +Debian64 : Debian, 64bit > # > # DroplineGNOME > # > @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ > > [ BuildBits ] > # work around http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22392 > -powerpc-svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff > +svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff > # fix to build with system libnspr (installed apart from mozilla), i#49720 > buildfix-system-nspr-m112.diff > # fix to build with system libnss (installed apart from mozilla) > diff -ruN > openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff > > openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff > --- > openoffice.org-2.0.1/ooo-build/patches/src680/svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff > 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 > +++ > openoffice.org-2.0.1-1/ooo-build/patches/src680/svx-customshapes-NOOPTFILES.diff > 2006-01-03 21:45:04.000000000 +0100 > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > +Index: svx/source/customshapes/makefile.mk > +=================================================================== > +RCS file: /cvs/graphics/svx/source/customshapes/makefile.mk,v > +retrieving revision 1.9 > +diff -u -u -r1.9 makefile.mk > +--- svx/source/customshapes/makefile.mk 1 Mar 2005 19:06:56 -0000 > 1.9 > ++++ svx/source/customshapes/makefile.mk 22 Aug 2005 02:01:36 -0000 > +@@ -81,5 +81,9 @@ > + .IF "$(OS)"=="MACOSX" > + NOOPTFILES= $(SLO)$/EnhancedCustomShapeFunctionParser.obj > + .ENDIF > ++# http://gcc.gnu.org/PR22392 > ++.IF "$(OS)"=="LINUX" && ("$(CPU)"=="P" || "$(CPU)"=="X") > ++NOOPTFILES= $(SLO)$/EnhancedCustomShapeFunctionParser.obj > ++.ENDIF > + > + UNOTYPES= com.sun.star.uno.XWeak > \ > + com.sun.star.uno.XNamingService > \ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
