On Sat 06 Apr, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 23:59, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > K?
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [nick]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo > > Processor : Intel StrongARM-110 rev 2 (v4l) > > BogoMIPS : 134.75 > > Features : swp 26bit fastmult > > Hardware : Acorn-RiscPC > > Revision : 0000 > > Serial : 0000000000000000 > Nope, don't think so. I haven't actually had the lid off to check, but > it reports as: > debian:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo > Processor : Intel StrongARM-110 rev 4 (v4l) > BogoMIPS : 222.50 > Hardware : Acorn-RiscPC > Revision : 0000 > Serial : 0000000000000000 > debian:~# I assume you are using the machie I lent you ? that does indeed have a rev S strongaem in it so thing should work properly. > I'm going to try a 2.4 kernel a bit later on to see if that works any > better. I'm a little bit nervous about changing the default at this > late stage in the game, but 2.4 does seem a lot more stable than last > time I thought about the idea. And, of course, 2.2 is no longer > maintained upstream so it might not be all that smart to go on relying > on it. I had a number of people erport that they can boot with 2.4 kernels (~2.4.5) but not 2.2 kernels (~2.2.13), so on the whole I'd favour 2.4 for the default unless we find something very bad. It's also necessary for kinetic support, should anyone ever get round to it. Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel +44 (0) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
