On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:07:24AM -0500, Bill Gatliff wrote: > Guys: > > > >>earm and earmeb? :) > >> > >> > > > >earmel and earmeb? > > > > > > armeleabi armebeabi? > > What's icky is that moving forward, EABI is going to be the norm. Sure > would be nice to have an arch name that's as easy and consistent to > remember as armel/armeb. :( > > Maybe with etch, ALL the ARM systems could go to EABI? Then we could > use armelabi and armebabi for the "old" ABI arches? (Is gcc/glibc ready > for large-scale EABI use?)
Changing the name for the existing ARM arch in Debian is *NOT* an option. It's been stated several times already. Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
