Bill Gatliff wrote:
David:
David Weinehall wrote:
Changing the name for the existing ARM arch in Debian is *NOT* an
option. It's been stated several times already.
I'm not suggesting that we change the name of anything. I'm only
suggesting that ARM etch become binary-incompatible with sarge. Which
I don't think would be unprecedented.
I'd rather that than have to remember that "armeb" is EABI, while "arm"
isn't; "armel" is, but ...
Does anyone have any expectation that sarge-built applications will run
without recompilation on etch?
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
