On 10 August 2012 09:54, Matt Palmer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 01:54:19PM +0200, phi gcc wrote: >> About QEMU, I am a bit ilitereate about QEMU/KVM, I know only vbox and >> its trivial GUI, I will look if booting an ARM kernel in a QEMU guest >> is ok regarding perf and kernel build. > > It's *significantly* quicker to do a build on a qemu-emulated ARM system > running on a nice modern x86 system than it is to do it on any of the ARM > systems I've ever had (although, admittedly, I've not tried any of the > modern shiny GHz+ ARM systems).
QEMU on my old-ish 2.4 GHz Core 2 laptop gives the equivalent to a 300 MHz Cortex-A8. We use PandaBoards in the toolchain group due to their availability and speed. -- Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANLjY-=c3nuelus9jyfrenh5ghubse15_qnwd8aduy6j1ew...@mail.gmail.com
