Hey, armel has been one of the sore points of maintaining WebKit in Debian. It often fails to build the package because of lack of memory or disk space. I'm told by my colleague Hector Oron that WebKit's utility for armel is quite limited, given it's often used headless rather than providing a graphical user interface of some kind.
Would there be anyone opposed to no longer building WebKitGTK+ for armel? Cheers, -- Gustavo Noronha Silva <[email protected]> Debian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
