nvm, I guess unstable binutils is up to date binutils (2.23.52.20130727-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream snapshot. -- Matthias Klose <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:37:11 +0200 binutils (2.23.52.20130722-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream snapshot. - Fix PR ld/15762, glibc being built without warning sections. * Set the libdir for arm64 to lib, not lib64. * Stop building the binutils-gold package, let binutils provide binutils-gold. Packages requiring gold should explicity pass -fuse-ld=gold to the compiler, packages requiring the bfd linker should pass -fuse-ld=bfd to the compiler. * Refresh patches. -- Matthias Klose <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:13:32 +0200 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Shawn Landden <[email protected]>wrote: > if using gold on armel <armv6, then you have to compile it yourself, as my > patch for unaligned memory access in binutils-gold 2.23 only got merged > July 17. > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15070 > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Gustavo Noronha Silva <[email protected]> writes: >> > Currently the package uses the default, I tend to use binutils-gold on >> > my personal builds. >> >> That explains the memory problem. Is there some technical problem for >> using gold also for the official builds? >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> [email protected] >> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] >> >> > > > -- > > --- > Shawn Landden > +1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred) > -- --- Shawn Landden +1 360 389 3001 (SMS preferred)
