On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > That's fine, of course! It's not like I'm advocating *against* Free > Software here. But AFAICS the main reason why people have suggested > the "replace the godawful forked vendor-provided U-Boot" process in > the past is pragmatism in terms of getting systems that will work at > all sensibly for users. With much better firmware available on better > systems, there isn't the same drive: in fact pushing to replace it > will make things harder for our users.
In summary, in both cases what works most easily was being advocated for rather than the FLOSS solution. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
