On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Ronald Maas wrote: > There was a presentation at the last Linaro Connect by someone working on > Centos. He specifically discussed the specific addition on the BSD license > related to the FAT driver. Furthermore he mentioned that the Red Hat / > Centos legal team reviewed this and found no concern for including Tianocore > as part of Centos (and I assume Red Hat too as both products are very > similar).
Interesting considering it isn't allowed to be in Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Testing_secureboot_with_KVM#EDK2_Licensing_Issues > Note ARM64 version of Centos has a hard requirement on SBSA /SBBR > compliance, so that probably explains their motivation to include Tianocore > in the distribution. Indeed, that is the likely explanation. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
