debian-arm  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Kirkwood ARMEL installer for Debian 12 "bookworm" fails to enumerate USB drives on Ionics-EMS Nimbus 100 Baker, Lawrence M
• Bug#1083037: directfb: Should this package be removed? Simon McVittie
  • Re: RM: directfb -- RoQA; RC-buggy, unmaintained Simon McVittie
• Bug#1082985: chatty: fails to build on armhf Jeremy Bícha
• Bug#1082659: libunwind8: 1.7 regression: Xvfb segfaults on armhf Simon McVittie
• Bug#1082588: libportal: FTBFS on armhf: tests pass but then command exits with status 1 Simon McVittie
• Bug#1082389: RM: src:gjs and rdeps [armel] -- RoM/RoQA; #1080521 Simon McVittie
• Bug#1082284: libunwind: FTBFS on arm64: expected 'unw_tdep_context_t *' but argument is of type 'ucontext_t *' Simon McVittie
• Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 YOYO
  • Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 YOYO
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 YOYO
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Marcin Juszkiewicz
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Michael Howard
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 YOYO
  • Re:Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 YOYO
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Michael Howard
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Steve McIntyre
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 Michael Howard
  • Re: Problems about installing Debian on Arm64 YOYO
• [Help] Re:input-utils: FTBFS on armhf: input.c:146:18: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’ Andreas Tille
  • Re: [Help] Re:input-utils: FTBFS on armhf: input.c:146:18: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’ Jeremy Sowden
  • Re: [Help] Re: input-utils: FTBFS on armhf: input.c:146:18: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’ Andreas Tille
  • Re: [Help] Re: input-utils: FTBFS on armhf: input.c:146:18: error: ‘struct input_event’ has no member named ‘time’ Jeremy Sowden
• Bug#1081698: RM: debian-installer [armel] -- ROM; armel support goes away Cyril Brulebois
• Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS on -ports architectures: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1081515: gtk4: FTBFS with weston 14: many tests fail with --setup=wayland: Failed to open display Simon McVittie
• Bug#1080521: transition: Removing gjs and GNOME Shell from armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1080521: transition: Removing gjs and GNOME Shell from armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1080521: transition: Removing gjs and GNOME Shell from armel Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1080521: transition: Removing gjs and GNOME Shell from armel Paul Gevers
  • Re: Bug#1080521: transition: Removing gjs and GNOME Shell from armel Jeremy Bícha
• Bug#1080323: gnome-snapshot: FTBFS on armel, armhf: LLVM runs out of memory Simon McVittie
• Bug#1080000: mozjs128: SharedArrayBuffer feature unavailable on armel Simon McVittie
• Re: Processed: Re: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Bug#1079443: Processed: Re: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored Stepan Golosunov
  • Re: Bug#1079443: Processed: Re: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored Aurelien Jarno
  • Re: Bug#1079443: Processed: Re: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored Aurelien Jarno
• Bug#1079545: gtk4: css/parser/math2.css test fails on armel Jeremy Bícha
  • Re: Bug#1079545: gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: css/parser/math2.css test fails on armel Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1079545: gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: css/parser/math2.css test fails on armel Martin
  • Re: Bug#1079545: gtk4: test regression in 4.15.x: css/parser/math2.css test fails on armel Simon McVittie
• Re: Bug#1079443: dracut-install ... -m =drivers/XXX is ignored [on armhf] Chris Hofstaedtler
• Bug#1079077: mozjs128: Fails to build on armel Jeremy Bícha
  • Re: Bug#1079077: mozjs128: Fails to build on armel Simon McVittie
• opencpn armel build error Alec Leamas
• Bug#1078916: rr crashes on aarch64 ARM Cortex-A53 Bernhard Übelacker
  • Re: Bug#1078916: rr crashes on aarch64 ARM Cortex-A53 Stephen Kitt
  • Re: Bug#1078916: rr crashes on aarch64 ARM Cortex-A53 Bernhard Übelacker
• Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices? Holger Wansing
  • Re: Bug#1078871: installer: reserve first 16 MiB space in default recipes for ARM devices? Pascal Hambourg
• MOCHAbin Rainer Dorsch
• Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Martin
  • Re: Latent bugs in armel, armhf packages built before t64 transition Leandro Cunha
• kf6-ktexttemplate FTBFS on arm64 with -O2 (build-time testsuite segfaults) Aurélien COUDERC
  • Re: kf6-ktexttemplate FTBFS on arm64 with -O2 (build-time testsuite segfaults) Emanuele Rocca
• Bug#1065552: fakeroot ftbfs on armel,armhf - test fix please Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Bug#1065552: fakeroot ftbfs on armel,armhf - test fix please Chris Hofstaedtler
• Debian on ARM64 shaun . corleys
  • Re: Debian on ARM64 Luna Jernberg
  • Re: Debian on ARM64 Alan Corey
  • Re: Debian on ARM64 Wookey
  • Re: Debian on ARM64 Alan Corey
• Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Bastien Roucariès
  • Re: Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Jérémy Lal
  • Re: Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Jérémy Lal
  • Re: Multiple failure for nodejs unrelated packages on armel Bastien Roucariès
• RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Hector Oron
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Hector Oron
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Martin
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Gandalf From The Conjurers
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Sebastian Ramacher
  • Re: Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Martin
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Paul Gevers
  • Re: Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Adrian Bunk
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Hector Oron
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Martin
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Rick Thomas
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Adrian Bunk
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Timo Jyrinki
  • Re: RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release Adrian Bunk
• [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline gene heskett
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline gene heskett
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Aaro Koskinen
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Tony Lindgren
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Krzysztof Kozlowski
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Linus Walleij
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Linus Walleij
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Richard Earnshaw
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Matt Turner
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Andrew Lunn
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Alexander Dahl
  • Re: [RFC} arm architecture board/feature deprecation timeline Arnd Bergmann
• libreoffice on armhf: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers Rene Engelhard
  • Re: libreoffice on armhf: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers Adrian Bunk
  • Re: libreoffice on armhf: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers Andreas Metzler
  • Re: libreoffice on armhf: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints or there are not enough registers Rene Engelhard
• Throttling RPi4 CPU to Avoid Overheating MPJ Grégoire
  • Re: Throttling RPi4 CPU to Avoid Overheating Freek de Kruijf
  • Re: Throttling RPi4 CPU to Avoid Overheating MPJ Grégoire
• Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Drew Parsons
  • Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Drew Parsons
  • Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Bug#1069425: uid-wrapper: FTBFS on armhf: 15: [ LINE ] --- ./tests/test_syscall.c:53: error: Failure! Drew Parsons
• PWM and SPI peripherals isidro
  • Re: PWM and SPI peripherals isidro
  • Re: PWM and SPI peripherals Uwe Kleine-König
• Bug#1075814: plotpy: Fails to build on arm64 Jeremy Bícha
• Bug#1075815: plotpy: Failing autopkgtests Jeremy Bícha
• Bug#1074588: rust-ntp-os-clock: Fails to build on armel & armhf Jeremy Bícha
• rpi4: linux-image-6.1.0-18-arm64 kernel does not detect ds1307 rtc Tuxo
  • Re: rpi4: linux-image-6.1.0-18-arm64 kernel does not detect ds1307 rtc Uwe Kleine-König
  • Re: rpi4: linux-image-6.1.0-18-arm64 kernel does not detect ds1307 rtc Uwe Kleine-König
• Bug#1074370: ffmpeg: Fails to build on armel & armhf Jeremy Bícha
• arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Bernhard Übelacker
  • Re: arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Bernhard Übelacker
  • Re: arm64, valgrind floating point instruction produces different result Bernhard Übelacker
• images with GPT partition tables andrew u frank
• Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Bug#1074111: [arm64] boot stops at 'Starting kernel ...' without any further output when kernel built with recent binutils Diederik de Haas
• Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Stéphane Glondu
  • Re: Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Emanuele Rocca
  • Re: Atomic 64-bit reads from mmap-ed memory on armel... Stéphane Glondu
• Re: Bug#1069498: libx86emu: FTBFS on armhf: mem.c:581:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’; did you mean ‘ins’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] Guillem Jover
  • Re: Bug#1069498: libx86emu: FTBFS on armhf: mem.c:581:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘inb’; did you mean ‘ins’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Re: Bug#1071272: linux: building the bookworm-backports armhf kernel causes OOM on buildds Aurelien Jarno
• Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: Builds not reproducible on armhf Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Vagrant Cascadian
  • Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Chris Hofstaedtler
  • Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: (java) Builds not reproducible on armhf Holger Levsen
• Bug#1070668: glibc: packages FTBFS caused by vector math library header on arm64 Aurelien Jarno
• Re: Re: arm eabi port, patches nikinicole50
• Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition Andreas Metzler
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition Andreas Tille
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition Étienne Mollier
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
  • Re: Status of the t64 transition Sebastian Ramacher
• Installation: root fs with btrfs fails. Arne Ploese
• Regression trixi ->sid: sshfs on Olimex A20-Lime2 Arne Ploese
  • Re: Regression trixi ->sid: sshfs on Olimex A20-Lime2 Arnd Bergmann
• Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Steffen Grunewald
  • Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Paul Wise
  • Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Steffen Grunewald
  • Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Lennart Sorensen
  • Re: Debian Bookworm+ on Cavium ThunderX? Wookey
• Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <[email protected]> (reply to Patrick Franz <[email protected]>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Thomas Lehmann
  • Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Hank Barta
  • Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support gene heskett
  • Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Thomas Lehmann
  • Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Diederik de Haas
  • Re: Raspberry Pi: gpiomem device support Uwe Kleine-König
• Bug#1068288: openjdk-21: bootstrap builds required on armel and armhf Sebastian Ramacher
• Bug#1068251: glibc: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures due to GCC defaulting to 64-bit time_t Aurelien Jarno
• Re: Bug#1068078: FTBFS on armel: shiboken2:smart::smart_pointer Newly detected Real test failure! Dmitry Shachnev
• What's wrong with this entry in a cron job? Freek de Kruijf
  • Re: What's wrong with this entry in a cron job? Leigh Brown
  • Re: What's wrong with this entry in a cron job? Freek de Kruijf
• Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Simon McVittie
  • Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: Bug#1036884: transition: time64_t - openjdk-17 needs re-bootstrap on armel,armhf Jeffrey Walton

• Earlier messages
• Later messages