Camm Maguire wrote:
> [Jeff]:
> LAM and MPICH evolved completely independantly, and hence have entirely
> different inner workings. Unfortunately, it's not as simple as just
> getting the enumerated constants in our .h files to agree -- there's a lot
> of interworkings below the MPI layer in both LAM and MPICH, none of which
> is common between the two systems.
>
> Sorry. :-(
LAM and MPICH have completely different architectures so we can't
expect to have binary compatibility. At any rate, the MPI standard does not
specify binary compatibility.
Regards,
--
Eray (exa) Ozkural
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
